Why do the restored clocks of Herentals’ Lakenhal matter beyond telling the time?
Herentals has restored the four clock faces on its historic Lakenhal and replaced their motors after one face had remained stopped for about six months. The practical takeaway is simple: people crossing the Grote Markt can once again rely on the tower clocks, while follow-up painting on the belfry’s exterior woodwork may still be visible.
The repair restores a familiar public reference point on Herentals’ main square and demonstrates how celebrated heritage depends on routine mechanical maintenance. For residents, traders and visitors, the direct consequence is that all approaches to the Grote Markt should again show the same, correct time.
The City of has restored all four clock faces on the belfry at the and replaced their motors, returning the landmark to normal operation after its west-facing clock had stood still for roughly half a year. Technicians used an aerial platform to reach the clocks, according to reports by and . They also installed more energy-efficient LED lighting. For residents and visitors, no special action is required: the four faces should again show the correct time, although painters may still be working on the tower’s exterior woodwork.
The repair is modest in scale, but highly visible. The belfry stands above the historic centre of this Dutch-speaking gemeente in Antwerp province, and its clocks face different approaches to the . One defective face therefore created an oddly selective version of local time: people arriving from one direction saw a stopped clock while the other three continued running.
reported in February 2026 that the face overlooking the De Zalm and Den Beiaard side had failed. An inspection commissioned by the city found that the motors serving all four clocks needed replacement, rather than only the visibly defective mechanism. Delivery times for the necessary components meant the repair could not be completed immediately. That earlier report helps explain why one of the uurwerken stood still for about six months before the broader intervention was carried out.
The city has not published a detailed technical diagnosis, the contract value or a precise service-life estimate for the new motors. It is therefore safer to describe this as a completed operational repair, followed by exterior painting, rather than as a comprehensive new restoration of the entire or its carillon. The clock faces, their drive mechanisms and the bells are related parts of the tower but are not interchangeable terms: repairing the visible clocks does not by itself mean that all components of the beiaard were renewed.
That distinction matters because the building has several layers of civic history. The Flemish Agency for Immovable Heritage, , identifies the site as a Gothic cloth hall and belfry at 50. Its heritage inventory says the building was reconstructed in 1534 by Peter Moens and Merten Casus after a major fire in 1512. had already developed around trade routes and a flourishing cloth industry, while the hall had been described as a town hall from 1430.
The clocks therefore belong to a building that once joined commerce, government and public timekeeping in one place. Before watches and phones made precise time personal, a public clock helped organise markets, work and civic routines. Its contemporary function is less essential, but it remains part of how the square looks and feels. A stationary hand on such a prominent tower is noticed precisely because the structure still acts as a shared reference point.
’ belfry also forms part of ’s transnational World Heritage property, the . UNESCO describes these towers as symbols of the growth of municipal power and civil liberties in medieval north-western Europe. Its documentation specifically lists the former town hall and cloth hall in Herentals among the protected components. The wider heritage value thus lies not in the clock motors themselves, but in keeping a working civic landmark legible and useful in everyday life.
For newcomers, the terminology can be confusing. means cloth hall, referring to the trade that supported many Low Countries towns. Belfort is belfry, the civic tower associated with municipal authority, bells and timekeeping. Beiaard means carillon, a tuned group of bells played manually or mechanically. In French-language heritage material, these may appear as halle aux draps, beffroi and carillon. itself operates in Dutch, so municipal notices and on-site wording will normally use the Flemish terms.
The episode also illustrates the unglamorous side of conservation. Visitors usually encounter heritage as finished architecture, yet historic public buildings depend on replaceable motors, wiring, lighting, paint and specialist access equipment. says the municipalities owning or using Flemish belfries play a central management role, while interventions affecting protected fabric fall under regional heritage oversight. In practice, preserving a monument often means combining old masonry and craftsmanship with discreet modern systems.
There are two legitimate expectations to balance. Residents and traders around the reasonably want a prominent public clock to work and faults to be resolved promptly. Heritage managers and municipal services, however, must diagnose interconnected equipment, source suitable parts and carry out elevated work without damaging protected fabric. The available reporting does not establish that the delay resulted from neglect; it attributes the wait to inspection and delivery of replacement materials.
For an English-speaking visitor, the useful orientation is straightforward. The is on the in central , and the restored clock faces can be viewed from the square. Questions about public works, access or possible temporary obstructions should go to through herentals.be; the city’s Dutch term for reporting a problem is usually melding. Heritage details are available through the Dutch-language Inventaris Onroerend Erfgoed, while provides broader information in English and French.
The immediate repair appears complete, and the next announced task is repainting exterior woodwork on the tower. The city has not said how long that finishing work will take or whether it will require restrictions around the building. What deserves watching is whether all four faces remain synchronised after the new motors settle into service—and whether publishes the cost or maintenance schedule. For now, the most visible outcome is reassuringly ordinary: whichever side of the people approach from, the should tell them the same time.
Impact
Regional — The impact is concentrated in Herentals and the wider Kempen area. It improves the appearance and everyday functioning of a central landmark without evidence of broader disruption or a significant regional economic effect.
Local — The direct impact is centred on the Grote Markt in Herentals. Residents, shopkeepers, workers and visitors approaching the square from different directions should again see the same correct time on all four faces. The restored clocks and LED lighting also improve the everyday presentation of a central Kempen landmark. Follow-up painting of exterior woodwork may remain visible around the belfry, but the available reporting does not indicate major access restrictions, wider disruption or a significant economic effect beyond the city centre.
International — Herentals’ belfry is one component of UNESCO’s cross-border Belfries of Belgium and France World Heritage property. The repairs therefore concern not only a municipal clock but the routine care of a landmark within an internationally recognised heritage group. No direct EU institutional, regulatory or cross-border travel consequence is reported. The international relevance is chiefly custodial: local mechanical repairs, lighting work and exterior maintenance help preserve the functioning and presentation of one Belgian element of the shared UNESCO property.
What it means for you
If you live, work or visit central Herentals, you can again use any of the four Lakenhal clock faces as a public time reference when crossing the Grote Markt. No action, booking or payment is required, and the reporting identifies no closure, transport change or new cost for residents and visitors. Be aware that follow-up painting of the belfry’s exterior woodwork may still be visible. Anyone planning a visit specifically for photography or an unobstructed heritage view should check current information from Stad Herentals before travelling.
Opposing perspectives
- Residents and Grote Markt businesses
People who use the square can reasonably expect a highly visible municipal clock to show the correct time and may question why one face remained stopped for months. For traders and regular passers-by, prompt maintenance also signals care for the historic centre.
- Municipal and heritage managers
Services responsible for a protected belfry must inspect interconnected equipment, obtain compatible parts and organise safe work at height. The available reporting attributes the delay to diagnosis and material delivery, and does not establish negligence.
Who, where and what
Key people, places and terms in this story
Herentals’ main square, from which the restored tower clocks are visible.
Kempen city where the restored Lakenhal and its belfry stand.
Sixteenth-century former town hall and central landmark whose four clock faces were restored.
Wider regional area surrounding Herentals.
UNESCO World Heritage property that includes the Herentals belfry.
Show the full library (12)
Kempen city where the restored Lakenhal and its belfry stand.
Sixteenth-century former town hall and central landmark whose four clock faces were restored.
Herentals’ main square, from which the restored tower clocks are visible.
Wider regional area surrounding Herentals.
UNESCO World Heritage property that includes the Herentals belfry.
Heritage theme area documented by Agentschap Onroerend Erfgoed and cited among the sources.
Municipal authority that commissioned or coordinated the clock and belfry work.
Flemish heritage agency that documents the protected monument and its heritage context.
International organisation whose World Heritage framework includes the Herentals belfry.
News organisation reporting on the completed restoration.
News organisation reporting that the belfry clocks again show the correct time.
Regional broadcaster that reported the earlier failure of one clock.
Sources & evidence
- View sourceVRT NWSPrimaryprimary· vrtnws.be· 25 August 2026Retrieved 25 August 2026· 38 days ago· Dated
- View sourceHet Nieuwsbladcorroborating· nieuwsblad.be· 25 August 2026Retrieved 25 August 2026· 38 days ago· Dated
- View sourceRTVbackground· rtv.be· 9 February 2026Retrieved 25 August 2026· 235 days ago· Background / context
- View sourceAgentschap Onroerend Erfgoedofficial· inventaris.onroerenderfgoed.beRetrieved 25 August 2026
Related topics
Related to this story
Pulse Insight — This topic connects to 10 associations and 2 funding programmes through the Flanders ecosystem.
Live connections from the Belgium Impulse ecosystem — not recommendations.
This briefing was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by a Belgium Impulse editor before publication. methodology.