Why has the EU condemned Ben-Gvir’s call for nightly killings in Gaza?
The EU has condemned Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir’s call to kill 30 to 40 people in Gaza every night, saying Israel’s government must restrain such incitement. Belgium had already declared the far-right minister persona non grata.
The remarks normalise killing people who are not described as immediate threats and use dehumanising language from within Israel’s cabinet. They also confront the EU with a practical question: whether condemnation should be followed by coordinated restrictions or sanctions.
The has condemned Israeli National Security Minister ’s call for 30 to 40 people to be killed in every night, directly connecting an inflammatory intervention in Israeli politics to decisions facing EU governments in Brussels. In a statement issued on 21 August, the European External Action Service called his language “egregious and inciteful” and said ’s government had a responsibility to rein it in. had already declared Ben-Gvir persona non grata under a federal package adopted in September 2025.
For people following the conflict from , the immediate issue is therefore larger than another provocative quotation. Ben-Gvir is a serving minister in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s coalition, while Belgium and the other EU member states must decide how political condemnation relates to visas, sanctions, trade and the Union’s wider relationship with . No separate public response to these particular remarks from Belgian Foreign Minister was located by the time of publication, but the federal government’s existing position already identifies Ben-Gvir as an extremist minister who undermines peace and international law.
Ben-Gvir made the remarks during an interview with , a former hostage held in , which aired on 15 August and circulated more widely the following day. The Associated Press and the Israeli newspaper The Times of both reported that he advocated “targeted assassinations” taking down 30 to 40 people nightly. He then extended the category beyond those posing an immediate danger, saying some people were “not worthy of life” and were “not even people”. He also argued for renewed Israeli settlement throughout Gaza and encouraged Palestinian emigration.
The distinction between rhetoric and operational authority matters. Ben-Gvir oversees ’s police and prison system and sits in the security cabinet, but he cannot order the Israeli military to conduct air strikes. His words nevertheless carry institutional weight because they come from inside the government rather than from a marginal activist. The Times of Israel reported that he was objecting to reduced military operations in and to efforts to advance a ceasefire plan. Netanyahu’s position remains that must be disarmed before Israel withdraws from its remaining positions.
Ben-Gvir’s supporters frame harsher action through the trauma of ’s 7 October 2023 attack, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 taken hostage, according to Israeli figures cited by AP. Braslavski’s participation underscores that trauma. Yet neither hostage suffering nor the pursuit of Hamas removes the legal requirement to distinguish combatants from civilians. Language denying people’s humanity also alarms diplomats because statements by senior officials can be examined as evidence of intent in international proceedings.
That does not itself settle the legal question of genocide. Allegations that is committing genocide in remain contested in proceedings before the International Court of Justice; Israel rejects them. Describing Ben-Gvir’s words accurately is therefore different from presenting a final judicial finding that has not been made. The careful conclusion is that the remarks advocate killings beyond immediate threats and intensify concerns already raised about forcible displacement and dehumanising official rhetoric.
’s position is more interventionist than a simple call for restraint. The federal agreement published by FPS Foreign Affairs declares Ben-Gvir and fellow far-right minister personae non gratae, while also targeting leaders, supporting a two-state solution and insisting that all hostages be released. It commits Belgium to settlement-import restrictions, stronger controls on military-related trade and further European measures. This dual framing—pressure on Israeli extremists alongside action against Hamas—is central to the Belgian approach and differs from accounts that reduce the dispute to personalities in Netanyahu’s coalition.
The next test will be whether the EU’s condemnation produces any collective measure against Ben-Gvir or remains diplomatic language. Unanimity requirements and divisions among member states have repeatedly constrained EU action on and Palestine. What remains unknown is whether Netanyahu will publicly reprimand his minister, whether Israeli prosecutors or other authorities will examine the remarks, and whether will press for Ben-Gvir’s national exclusion to become a coordinated Schengen or EU measure.
Impact
Regional — Belgium has already barred Ben-Gvir politically by declaring him persona non grata and has said it will seek wider European support for measures against extremists obstructing peace. The remarks may strengthen pressure for coordinated Schengen or EU action.
International — The EU’s condemnation places responsibility on Israel’s government to restrain rhetoric from a serving cabinet minister. It also gives Belgium a new basis for pursuing wider European backing for restrictions on Ben-Gvir and other extremists deemed to obstruct peace. Any coordinated EU or Schengen response would require agreement beyond Belgium; the material on file establishes condemnation and Belgium’s intention to seek support, but does not identify a new sanctions decision, travel ban or implementation timetable.
What it means for you
For Belgium-based readers, there is no new personal action, cost or legal obligation arising from the EU statement. Belgium’s September 2025 designation already sets its national political position toward Ben-Gvir and Smotrich. The next concrete development to watch is whether other European governments support coordinated restrictions or sanctions. Until such a decision is formally announced, the 21 August 2026 EU response remains a condemnation rather than a new EU-wide measure. Travellers and residents should not interpret it as confirmation of a Schengen-wide entry ban.
Opposing perspectives
- European Union diplomatic position
The European External Action Service called Ben-Gvir’s language “egregious and inciteful”, said it was unacceptable and insisted that Israel’s government must rein it in. This framing treats the remarks as a governmental responsibility, not merely domestic campaign rhetoric.
- Ben-Gvir and Israel’s far-right constituency
Ben-Gvir presented intensified killings, Palestinian emigration and renewed settlement as security measures following the 7 October attack. His position goes beyond Netanyahu’s stated insistence on disarming Hamas and rejects the reduced pace of Israeli strikes.
- Belgian federal government position
Belgium combines pressure on Ben-Gvir and violent settlers with measures against Hamas leaders, demands for hostage releases and support for Israel’s recognition by Arab states. Its policy therefore rejects both far-right Israeli obstruction and Hamas’s role in future Palestinian governance.
Who, where and what
Key people, places and terms in this story
EU member state that declared Ben-Gvir and Smotrich personae non gratae in September 2025.
Country whose government the EU urged to restrain Ben-Gvir’s incitement.
Israel’s national security minister, whose call for nightly killings in Gaza was condemned by the EU.
Former hostage who appeared in the podcast during which Ben-Gvir made the remarks.
Israeli minister declared persona non grata by Belgium alongside Ben-Gvir in September 2025.
Show the full library (12)
Israel’s national security minister, whose call for nightly killings in Gaza was condemned by the EU.
Former hostage who appeared in the podcast during which Ben-Gvir made the remarks.
Israeli minister declared persona non grata by Belgium alongside Ben-Gvir in September 2025.
Belgian foreign-policy figure associated with Belgium’s position on measures against extremists obstructing peace.
Country whose government the EU urged to restrain Ben-Gvir’s incitement.
EU member state that declared Ben-Gvir and Smotrich personae non gratae in September 2025.
Palestinian territory whose residents were the subject of Ben-Gvir’s call for nightly killings.
Cross-border travel framework within which wider coordinated restrictions could be considered.
Political union that condemned Ben-Gvir’s language on 21 August 2026.
Palestinian organisation fighting Israel in the Gaza war and referenced in the article’s context.
Government that adopted Belgium’s September 2025 persona non grata decision.
Government body of which Ben-Gvir is a member.
Sources & evidence
- View sourceDe StandaardPrimaryprimary· standaard.beRetrieved 25 August 2026
- View sourceAssociated Presscorroborating· apnews.com· 16 August 2026Retrieved 25 August 2026· 47 days ago· Dated
- View sourceThe Times of Israelcorroborating· timesofisrael.com· 17 August 2026Retrieved 25 August 2026· 46 days ago· Dated
- View sourceEuropean External Action Serviceofficial· eeas.europa.eu· 21 August 2026Retrieved 25 August 2026· 42 days ago· Dated
Related topics
Related to this story
Live connections from the Belgium Impulse ecosystem — not recommendations.
This briefing was prepared with AI assistance and reviewed by a Belgium Impulse editor before publication. methodology.